pc: sleep to frog communication..... 2

[squirt]

Comments

[frogzoned]

What is it?

[roseoftexas]

[ shows frug phone: ]

it looks like they're really going for world erasure. they're really stubborn that way, aren't they? at least the winner can use their points to also bring others back to the realground, but i'm afraid i don't really think they'd be able to save too many unless they really work for it with how much it costs. what a shame, isn't it? i hope this group won't be anti-violence.

[honkinbigteeth]

so that makes it sound like we can save our worlds if
we get enough points to save everyone else too!

[dendroculi]

The problem is earning the points.

[honkinbigteeth]

i mean
well what do you mean by that nahida?

[dendroculi]

The bit about hoping we won't be anti-violence at the end...

It more or less confirms what people have been saying: that the points we earn from our tasks are much less compared to the points earned from erasure. If we're too pacifistic, we may not have the points we need to save anyone.

[honkinbigteeth]

oh i see
thats really bad news nahida

[dendroculi]

It could be worse news, but...

I do worry that we don't have the full picture yet. We learn a little more from these messages each week, and they seem to be pointing in a certain direction. But what happens if as a group we go past the point of no return, and it turns out it wasn't what we thought?

But on the other hand... what if it is what it sounds like, and by waiting for confirmation, we lose our chance?

I also worry about how... chaotic it might be, if too many people see this message, and decide to take things into their own hands.

[honkinbigteeth]

yeah i mean we dont know who is in the lead too what if we accidentally make the team in the lead get less points?

but at least for me

i dont know
is it ok if i tell you a story?

[squirt]

[ okay, reeling back a little, ]

everyone has been hoping for a solution to save the entire group. if everyone starts killing all at once that doesnt help anybody

its important to be careful with this
even if its better news than weve gotten

[roseoftexas]

There's a few things as well -- we could assign one team to win, and let them collect the majority of the points.

But that's asking a lot of people: to put their trust in people they may not know well; trusting the team to go through with the revival process, and trusting others not to kill the "winning" team before their time.

[frogzoned]

Oof.

[honkinbigteeth]

isnt this good?
we didnt know we can save other people
but we can!

[frogzoned]

If someone wins. And it sounds like you have to win by a good deal. Apparently the cost is high.

[honkinbigteeth]

yeah so i guess we should ask the reapers how many points it is
but we'll do it
we'll get shenhe back and buzen and matsui and rin and rang lee and everybody






























and i guess count d he probably has a lot of animals in his pet store that would be erased if he wasnt saved so we'll do it for the animals

[frogzoned]

If you say so.

[ HE IS SO UNSURE ABOUT COUNT D ]

[honkinbigteeth]

imagine if our whole world was being judged just based on the person in it whose the biggest dick!

[squirt]

just for the animals

[ still kind of pissed about this one dude in particular ]

[honkinbigteeth]

t chan did nothing wrong

[ohthehumanities]

I tried to ask about points once but they didn't really tell me anything specific
You might have better luck, though

[honkinbigteeth]

yeah ill try to find out
guys cheer up we can do it!
i guess if its nonviolence that would be so sad
and also bad
but also this is what weve been waiting for

[squirt]

we can try asking too
reviving one person is a lot of points but reviving everyone must work a little differently

[roseoftexas]

Yeah. Oof.

[ohthehumanities]

[vibes silently in Upset]

[roseoftexas]

[ so same as usual then ]